A hernia mesh attorney provides basic information about hernia mesh lawsuits pending in the United States. This post focuses on various Atrium C-QUR™hernia mesh lawsuits 2018. These C-Qur lawsuits are now multi-district litigation pending in New Hampshire Federal Courts. No global settlement has been achieved by the hernia mesh lawsuit attorneys as of this date.Sadly, C-Qur hernia mesh has caused severe pain and suffering and complications in scores of victims across the United States and Canada. If you are in need of a hernia mesh lawyer, contact the best hernia mesh lawsuit law firm in the United States.

Atrium C-QUR™ hernia mesh lawsuit 2018

(Please note that this post focuses on lawsuits pending in Federal Court.  A hernia mesh Lawsuit could also be filed in state courts)

atruim-C-Qur

Atruim C-Qur lawsuit 2018

Types of lawsuit: Multi District Litigation

Court deciding claims:  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.

The presiding justice:  Judge Landya McCafferty

Federal Court address:  55 Pleasant Street Room 110 Concord, NH 03301,

Phone number of Court: 603.225.1423.

Case caption for hernia mesh lawsuit: In Re: Atrium Medical Corp. C-QUR™ Mesh Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2753)  

MDL Docket No: Case No.: 16-md-2753 LM

List of individual cases: Listing of Individual Cases as of August 28, 2017

510(k) Premarket Notification: Applicant- Atrium Medical Corp.

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION: Transfer order

the best hernia mesh lawyer

Finding the best hernia mesh lawyers in the United States

“On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we find that these actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization in the District of New Hampshire will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. All the actions share common factual questions arising out of allegations that defects in defendants’ C-Qur mesh products incite an allergic or inflammatory response that causes severe complications. All the actions involve factual questions relating to whether C-Qur mesh was defectively designed or manufactured, whether defendants knew or should have known of the alleged propensityof C-Qur mesh to result in an allergic or inflammatory response, and whether defendants provided adequate instructions and warnings with the mesh. These common factual issues are sufficiently complex to merit centralized treatment. Centralization will eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel, and the judiciary.” UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: ATRIUM MEDICAL CORP. C-QUR MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2753 TRANSFER ORDER

General Information:

Instructions for Docketing in MDL Cases and Spreading to Member Cases

Instructions for Direct File in the MDL Case

Instructions for Opening a Civil Case

Application for ECF Login/Password – MDL Cases Only

District of New Hampshire’s Local Rules
(Appendix A for Supplemental Rules for Electronic Case Filing)

MDL Rules & Procedures (source)

Case Manager/Docketing Clerk:

Donna Esposito
(603) 225-1623
donna_esposito@nhd.uscourts.gov

Back-up case manager:
Judy Barrett-Weatherbee
(603) 225-1587
judy_barrett@nhd.uscourts.gov

CM/ECF Helpdesk: (603) 225-1423 Option 7

Case management orders:

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NUMBER 1,  January 13, 2017

““The actions listed in Attachment A are consolidated for pretrial purposes. Any “tag-along” actions later

Hernia mesh attorney-Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

settlement Hernia Mesh Lawsuit lawyers

removed to or transferred to this court, or directly filed in this court, will automatically be consolidated with this action without the necessity of future motions or orders. This consolidation, however, does not constitute a determination that the actions should be consolidated for trial, nor does it have the effect of making any entity a party to any action in which he, she, or it has not been named, served, or added in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 2

“In order to eliminate delay and to promote judicial efficiency, any plaintiff whose case would qualify for transfer to MDL No. 2753 under the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation’s December 8, 2016 transfer order (doc. no. 1) may file his or her complaint directly in MDL No. 2753 in this court. Defendants reserve the right to object to the inclusion of any such action in this MDL.”  (Direct Filing and Waiver of Service)

Hernia mesh lawsuit settlements: There has been no  global C-Qur hernia mesh settlement 2017. There has been no global C-Qur hernia mesh settlement 2016. No hernia mesh lawyer can state an average C-Qur hernia mesh settlement 2017.

Know before file hernia mesh lawsuitA hernia mesh victim should carefully search for the best hernia mesh law firm. The best hernia mesh attorneys will be from large firms with the resources and experience to litigate these complex matters. The reputation of a top hernia mesh law firm will help the defective medical device victim get the hernia mesh settlement they deserve.

Hernia mesh lawsuit settlement amounts: There is no way that any hernia mesh lawyers or mesh law firms can adequately inform you of the amount of mesh settlement you will receive. If you search google you will see a lot of  searches about “hernia mesh settlement 2018” or “mesh settlement 2018.”  None of these product liability, defective and unsafe hernia mesh posts can truthfully inform you of the settlement for your hernia mesh claim.

C-qur the best hernia mesh lawyer

Finding the best hernia mesh attorneys n the United States

More information about Re: Atrium Medical Corp. C-QUR™ Mesh Products Liability Litigation:   Atrium C-QUR Mesh Lawsuit 2017: What, Where, Why, & How?

Hernia mesh lawsuit symptoms: 

“Based on FDA’s analysis of medical device adverse event reports and of peer-reviewed, scientific literature, the most common adverse events for all surgical repair of hernias—with or without mesh—are pain, infection, hernia recurrence, scar-like tissue that sticks tissues together (adhesion), blockage of the large or small intestine (obstruction), bleeding, abnormal connection between organs, vessels, or intestines (fistula), fluid build-up at the surgical site (seroma), and a hole in neighboring tissues or organs (perforation).

The most common adverse events following hernia repair with mesh are pain, infection, hernia recurrence, adhesion, and bowel obstruction. Some other potential adverse events that can occur following hernia repair with mesh are mesh migration and mesh shrinkage (contraction).

Many complications related to hernia repair with surgical mesh that have been reported to the FDA have been associated with recalled mesh products that are no longer on the market. Pain, infection, recurrence, adhesion, obstruction, and perforation are the most common complications associated with recalled mesh. In the FDA’s analysis of medical adverse event reports to the FDA, recalled mesh products were the main cause of bowel perforation and obstruction complications.” FDA

What type of information are people seeking about hernia?

  • hernia groin
  • hernia stomach
  • hernia treatment
  • c qur mesh
  • hernia pictures
  • groin hernia symptoms
  • hernia belly button
  • types of hernia
  • hernia definition

What types of questions are people asking about hernias?