As hernia mesh lawyers dedicated to victims injured due to defective mesh, we have compiled this website to explain in detail hernia mesh lawsuits and hernia mesh recalls. Numerous hernia mesh lawyers, across the United States are filing hernia mesh related lawsuits. These lawsuits have been filed on behalf of aggrieved victims suffering from injuries and complications caused by hernia mesh medical devices. Hernia mesh symptoms could occur immediately after mesh is implanted. In some cases, there could be hernia mesh problems years later. Attorneys for aggrieved individuals have filed individual lawsuits alleging that certain brands of hernia mesh are defective. None of these lawsuits require a hernia mesh recall.
No requirement of a hernia mesh recall to file a lawsuit
It is not necessary for a hernia mesh recall in order to file a hernia mesh lawsuit. Many victims incorrectly believe that a hernia mesh recall is required to be compensated for defective surgical mesh. We started this hernia mesh liability information center to address a real lack of reliable information on the internet about hernia mesh particularly Ethicon Physiomesh™. Victim’s across the United States and Canada are seeking good, current and real information concerning hernia mesh claims, hernia mesh recall and mesh lawsuits. Victims are seeking information about hernia mesh settlement 2018 and the possibility of surgical mesh settlements 2018. Victims are wondering, will there be a hernia mesh recall? Has my surgical mesh been subject to a hernia mesh recall? What are the signs of a hernia mesh infection?
Our Hernia Mesh Attorneys are Seeking Justice and Compensation on behalf of victims
Defective medical device attorneys are seeking justice and compensation on behalf of innocent victims who have suffered serious pain and suffering. We are helping victim’s hold Johnson and Johnson’ corporate subsidiary Ethicon and other corporate entities liable for the device the manufactured. Hernia mesh law firms are trying to get the word out to the public that a hernia mesh recall helps to win a mesh lawsuit but that a hernia mesh recall is not required to get justice and compensation as a result of defective surgical mesh. Plaintiff’s attorneys have alleged that such medical devices have caused pain and suffering to victims in the United States and Canada. Many victims are not aware that a hernia mesh recall is not required to file a hernia mesh lawsuit.
Hernia Mesh Lawyer Hotline
Speak with an Attorney Today!
Hernia Mesh made of non-absorbable polypropylene such as Physiomesh™
This hernia mesh liability information portal primarily focuses on hernia mesh medical devices made of non-absorbable polypropylene. Another focus of this information portal is Ethicon Physiomesh™ manufactured by Johnson and Johnson’s subsidiary Ethicon. Unfortunately, there is no way to determine what an average hernia mesh settlement should be. Victims should constantly research any new mesh settlement update. Many victims are seeking to file a hernia mesh class action lawsuit. However, we cannot emphasize enough that the mesh lawsuits are NOT hernia mesh class action lawsuits. We also need to emphasize that a hernia mesh recall is not required to file a hernia mesh lawsuit. In fact there have not been a lot of hernia mesh recalls. There is no doubt that a hernia mesh recall would support a hernia mesh attorney’s legal argument that a particular type of abdominal mesh is defective. Some victims are dismayed that there is no mesh settlement center.
Hernia Mesh Cases we are reviewing:
We are currently reviewing potential cases of the following types of hernia mesh, made of non-absorbable polypropylene that may have caused injuries and pain and suffering:
- Ethicon Physiomesh™
- Atrium C-QUR
- Composix® Kugel® mesh patches (manufactured by C.R. Bard subsidiary Davol)
- All C.R. Bard mesh patches made of Marlex polypropylene
- Parietex Composite Ventral Patch,
- Parietex ProGrip Self-Fixating Mesh
- Parietex Optimized Composite Mesh
- Parietex Plug and Patch System
- Parietex Composite Open Skirt (PCO OS) Mesh
- Parietex Optimized Open Skirt Mesh
- Parietex Composite Parastomal (PCO PM) Mesh
- Parietex Composite Hiatal Mesh (PCO 2H)
- Parietex Hydrophilic Anatomical Mesh
- Parietex Folding Mesh
- Parietex Flat Sheet Mesh
- Parietex Lightweight Monofilament Mesh
- C-Qur Mosaic
- C-Qur Edge
- C-Qur TacShield
- C-Qur Lite Mesh V-Patch
- C-Qur Mesh V-Patch
- C-Qur (entire line except for C-Qur FX & C-Qur CentriFX)
- Composix EX
- 3D Max
- Perfix Plug
- Composix Kugel
- Ventrio ST
- Sepramesh IP Composite
- Ventralex ST
How many Physiomesh hernia mesh implants?
According to Drug Watch, “Ethicon sold about 330,000 Physiomesh™ hernia mesh implants worldwide. It sold about 50 percent of those products in the U.S., according to plaintiffs. Ethicon voluntarily pulled the mesh from the market in May 2016 after it found higher rates of reoperation and hernia recurrence.” More Here
What is going on now with hernia Mesh Cases?
Let’s start by dispelling a myth that is floating around: These hernia mesh cases are not a class action. Again, we repeat, these cases are not class actions. If you want to file a hernia mesh lawsuit, it will not be part of a hernia mesh class action. There are no hernia mesh lawsuits in the United States that are part of class actions. These hernia mesh lawsuits against Johnson and Johnson and their subsidiary Ethicon are currently before the Judicial Panel on multidistrict litigation (MDL). These cases are now Multidistrict litigation Case MDL No.2782 , “In re Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation.” Another popular myth among victims is that a particular surgical mesh must be subject to a hernia mesh recall in order to file a hernia mesh lawsuit.
What is the current status of these Physiomesh™ hernia mesh cases?
Plaintiff’s attorneys have filed a motion to transfer all their cases to the “Middle District of Florida, or in the alternative, to the Southern District of Illinois.” The Plaintiff’s hernia mesh lawsuit lawyers in their brief cite, 28 U.S Code Section 1407 – Multidistrict litigation, in support of their motion.**
The attorneys for the injured parties argue that Physiomesh™ devices “were defectively designed” and “failed to provide appropriate warnings” resulting in the Defendant’s “voluntarily withdrew the Physiomesh™ device from the market.” BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR TRANSFER TO THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407 – Details here
(Editor’s notes | update 6/2/17: The Panel on Multi District Litigation ordered that “IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions listed on Schedule A and pending outside the Northern District of Georgia are transferred to the Northern District of Georgia and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Richard W. Story for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Transfer order)
Many people believe that Physiomesh was part of a hernia mesh recall. Physiomesh was voluntarily removed from the market, there was no hernia mesh recall for Physiomesh.
Speak directly with a Hernia Mesh Attorney
Speak with an Attorney Today!
The Plaintiff’s argue that each mesh lawsuit should be heard before one Court and one Justice in the Middle District of Florida. Id. The Plaintiff’s counsel argue that the first mesh lawsuit was filed in that district and the most amount of cases are pending there. Id.
Johnson and Johnson for their part opposed the victims motion to transfer. “Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary Ethicon Inc. on April 13 opposed a motion by nine plaintiffs to centralize federal lawsuits alleging injury from the Physiomesh Flexible Composite hernia patch (In Re: Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2782, JPMDL).” Lexis legal news
On May 25th, 2017, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) will hold “a hearing to determine whether it should consolidate all Ethicon Physiomesh™ lawsuits filed in federal courts (MDL No. 2782)” The Driscoll firm PC.
Hernia Mesh Victims Legal Hotline
Speak with an Attorney Today!
What types of complications and side effects may be caused by hernia mesh:
Hernia mesh side effects and complications and hernia mesh infection symptoms that could be grounds for a hernia mesh lawsuit may include:
- Mesh migration
- Bacterial infections
- Hernia recurrence
- Additional surgeries to treat hernia recurrence
- hernia mesh ripped
Some complications and hernia mesh infection symptoms may be so severe that they may even lead to death.
What does the FDA describe as “adverse events” caused by hernia mesh
“Based on FDA’s analysis of medical device adverse event reports and of peer-reviewed, scientific literature, the most common adverse events for all surgical repair of hernias—with or without mesh—are pain, infection, hernia recurrence, scar-like tissue that sticks tissues together (adhesion), blockage of the large or small intestine (obstruction), bleeding, abnormal connection between organs, vessels, or intestines (fistula), fluid build-up at the surgical site (seroma), and a hole in neighboring tissues or organs (perforation).
The most common adverse events following hernia repair with mesh are pain, infection, hernia recurrence, adhesion, and bowel obstruction. Some other potential adverse events that can occur following hernia repair with mesh are mesh migration and mesh shrinkage (contraction). Many victims wonder: how to know if my hernia mesh is ripped?
Many complications related to hernia repair with surgical mesh that have been reported to the FDA have been associated with recalled mesh products that are no longer on the market. Pain, infection, recurrence, adhesion, obstruction, and perforation are the most common complications associated with recalled mesh. In the FDA’s analysis of medical adverse event reports to the FDA, recalled mesh products were the main cause of bowel perforation and obstruction complications” Source FDA
What is a hernia surgery? | Hernia mesh recall?
Many doctors utilize hernia mesh when they are performing a hernia surgery. A hernia surgery is a serious matter and you should research the best hernia surgeons.
“Surgery has generally been recommended for all inguinal hernias to avoid complications such as strangulation, in which a loop of intestine becomes tightly trapped in a hernia, cutting off the blood supply to that part of the intestine. If a hernia in an adult can be pushed back (reduced), surgery can be done at the person’s convenience. If it cannot be pushed back, surgery must be done sooner. But surgery may not be needed if the hernia is small and you do not have symptoms. Consult with your doctor to decide if you need hernia repair surgery.” See https://www.webmd.com/digestive-disorders/tc/inguinal-hernia-surgery#1
Many mesh victims are unaware that there a hernia mesh recall ia no.t required to file a hernia mesh lawsuit. There is currently no hernia mesh recall for Ventralex mesh manufactured by Bard Davol. There is currently no hernia mesh recall for Ethicon mesh such as Physiomesh or Prolene mesh. Rather than a hernia mesh recall, Ethicon voluntarily removed Physiomesh from the market. Ehicon was too concerned about the liability implications of a hernia repair mesh recall. A hernia repair mesh recall would have been music to the ears of personal injury attorneys and hernia mesh law firms.
What is an inguinal hernia?
“An inguinal hernia occurs in the abdomen near the groin area. They develop when fatty or intestinal tissues push through a weakness in the abdominal wall near the right or left inguinal canal. Each inguinal canal resides at the base of the abdomen. Both men and woman have inguinal canals. In men, the testes usually descend through their canal by around a few weeks before birth. In women, each canal is the location of passage for the round ligament of the uterus. If you have a hernia in or near this passageway, it results in a protruding bulge. It may be painful during movement.” https://www.healthline.com/health/inguinal-hernia
Hernia mesh lawsuit settlements
Hernia mesh lawsuit settlements amounts are often not reported and sometimes mesh settlements are confidential. Many victims are surprised to learn that most hernia mesh has not been subject to a hernia mesh recall. A victim who has endured hernia mesh infection symptoms for years may be despondent and suffer through depression. he or she may spend hours or days looking for a mesh settlement update. If you did not file a hernia mesh lawsuit 2017, be careful that you do not miss a hernia mesh lawsuit deadline otherwise known as a mesh statute of limitations. You will not be part of a hernia mesh class action lawsuit because there are currently no surgical mesh class actions in the United States. Most importantly you need to learn what you need to know before you file hernia mesh lawsuit. IT IS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE HERNIA MESH SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS 2018 since no mesh settlements were reported to the public. Also every victim has different hernia mesh infection symptoms so it is impossible to determine what mesh settlement 2018 will be received based on a mesh settlement 2017.
Speak with a Hernia Mesh Lawyer Today!
Did Johnson and Johnson recall “ETHICON PHYSIOMESH™?
No. technically, Johnson and Johnson’s actions in the United States did not constitute a hernia mesh recall. However, on May 27th, 2016 a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson, Ethicon, issued an urgent medical device removal of its “ETHICON PHYSIOMESH™ Flexible Composite Mesh (All Product Codes)
In the letter, Johnson and Johnson stated, “We have initiated a worldwide medical device removal of ETHICON PHYSIOMESH™ Flexible Composite Mesh (for laparoscopic use) (“ETHICON PHYSIOMESH™ Composite Mesh”). We are removing the product following an analysis conducted at the request of the Ethicon Medical Safety Team of unpublished data from two (2) large independent hernia registries (Herniamed German Registry and Danish Hernia DatabaseDHDB). The recurrence/reoperation rates (respectively) after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using ETHICON PHYSIOMESH™ Composite Mesh were higher than the average rates of the comparator set of meshes among patients in these registries. ” Medical Device Removal of Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Mesh Page 1 of 7
The removal letter went on to state in pertinent part, “Based on the currently available data, we believe the higher rates to be a multifactorial issue (including possible product characteristics, operative and patient factors), but we have not been able to fully characterize these factors. Consequently, we have not been able at this time to issue further instructions to surgeons that might lead to a reduction in the recurrence rate and have decided to remove ETHICON PHYSIOMESH™ Composite Mesh from the global market. Medical Device Removal of Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Mesh Page 1 of 7
** in their brief in support of their transfer motion Plaintiff’s hernia mesh lawyers argue:
- “All of the plaintiffs in the constituent cases claim that the devices implanted in their bodies were defectively designed and/or manufactured, and that the defendants failed to provide appropriate warnings and instructions regarding the dangers posed by these devices” BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR TRANSFER TO THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407
- The Brief goes on to state, “The defendants ultimately voluntarily withdrew the Physiomesh device from the market in May 2016, which Plaintiffs intend to establish was a direct consequence of the frequency and severity of the complications experienced with this product worldwide.” Id.
- “The plaintiffs herein suffered serious and often permanent physical injuries from the implantation of the Physiomesh, often requiring additional surgeries, additional medical expenses, and unresolved medical complications. Where applicable, these implant plaintiffs’ spouses have alleged claims for loss of consortium.” Id.
*** “When civil actions involving one or more common questions of fact are pending in different districts, such actions may be transferred to any district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Such transfers shall be made by the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation authorized by this section upon its determination that transfers for such proceedings will be for the convenience of parties and witnesses and will promote the just and efficient conduct of such actions.” 28 U.S. Code § 1407 – Multidistrict litigation
Hernia Mesh Victims Legal Hotline
Speak with an Attorney Today!